|
Post by qooqǝɯɐƃ on Aug 10, 2010 6:55:07 GMT -5
It would be awesome to live in the world Jacque Fresco has designed, but is it possible? I haven't spent much time reading or learning about it so I'd like to hear some opinions! The first problem that comes to my mind is, even though the society is a based on abundant resources, will there be enough metal to create all the material used throughout the society's existence? Surely they'd run out of some types of metals at some point. And I'm sure there are other problems with the venus project. Most of them having to do with human psychology rather than physical possibility. So please, let me know what you think -- what flaws have you noticed? And would you like to live in that society? For those who haven't heard of The Venus Project, you can Watch Zeitgeist 2: Addendum, Visit their website, or Search YouTube for some videos about it.
|
|
|
Post by low on Aug 10, 2010 9:15:54 GMT -5
Among the flaws are that the people behind Zeitgeist are known conspiracy theorists (making them not worthy of the intellectual respect of anyone who requires real evidence to believe in something, not just the simple assertion that all evidence with credibility is lying to you) who appear to falsely subscribe to the now dead theory of behaviorism, believing that human nature can somehow be changed drastically by changing conditions. The brain is a series of modules created by genes to adapt to the environment and survive. For someone who is not a neuroscientist nor a psychologist, not even a sociologist, to assert that the problem of crime could all be solved simply through a utopian socialist model, is completely arrogant if not belligerently stupid.
|
|
|
Post by qooqǝɯɐƃ on Aug 10, 2010 9:49:30 GMT -5
low So you're saying that humans are completely formed genetically, through nature? And nurture is of no significance in shaping who the person is? Well I don't know if you're correct but I can assume you are a neuroscientist, or a psychologist, or maybe even a sociologist because of the assertion you make of behaviourism being a dead theory. If not it would be "completely arrogant if not belligerently stupid" to do so. And btw the Venus Project is not a utopia or socialist society. When you describe it that way you sound like you misunderstand the society.
|
|
|
Post by low on Aug 10, 2010 11:25:11 GMT -5
low So you're saying that humans are completely formed genetically, through nature? And nurture is of no significance in shaping who the person is? No, but it's completely pointless to say that you can't be a fan of The Beatles if you've never heard The Beatles' music and similar things that would lead in the direction of behaviorism if not challenged up front. At this point in time, cognitive science is divided into two main schools of thought, nicknamed east-coast (MIT) and west-coast (Stanford, UC Berkeley), though they're not exclusively limited to their respective coasts. The schools of thought are divided on their level of empiricism vs innateness, east-coast theorists believing more is innate, west-coast believing a greater deal is learned, though neither of them currently deny that genes are crucially important, setting both schools very far away from BF Skinner and behaviorism. The notion of the blank slate was a politically correct denial of reality. No denial of reality, even when it's good-intentioned (fear of eugenics), is good. What I am saying is that you can't create a society with no crime or violence because there are genetic incentives for power and competition and a scarily significant portion of the male population is sociopaths. Well I don't know if you're correct but I can assume you are a neuroscientist, or a psychologist, or maybe even a sociologist because of the assertion you make of behaviourism being a dead theory. If not it would be "completely arrogant if not belligerently stupid" to do so. I don't have a degree yet, but I do have knowledge of the subject matter that isn't prior to 1990, nor do I try to create a universal theory encompassing all religion and astrology, among other debunked nonsense, or spread the ridiculous and ever-debunked idea that the September 11th attacks were done by the US Government for the benefit of corporations. (I should remind you that this is a critique of the entirety of Zeitgeist: The Movie. I have no word as to whether or not the Venus project is directly associated with the rest of the film.) And btw the Venus Project is not a utopia or socialist society. When you describe it that way you sound like you misunderstand the society. I should have said communism, actually, but I could be wrong on that level. Maybe you could explain to me better what the means and ways of this project are. I feel like I need to remind you that this criticism is not of you, but of Fresco, even if it may not seem this way. His ideas have brainwashed a lot of innocent people, some people who I've known. (To clarify, brainwashing isn't something that happens with special techniques or chemicals people put in water supplies, or whatever Alex Jones shouts that it might be, but rather it's simply making the desired behaviors seem casual and natural. There is no "brainwashing," only suggestion, and it's something found more often in cult-leaders--which is what I believe is an appropriate term for Fresco is--than the government or big brother, etc.)
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Aug 10, 2010 17:19:15 GMT -5
this is associated with zeitgeist. i am disregarding it out of hand.
|
|
|
Post by Lex on Aug 10, 2010 17:27:18 GMT -5
this is associated with zeitgeist. i am disregarding it out of hand.
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Aug 11, 2010 0:38:33 GMT -5
omg...we agree on something...this must really be bad...
|
|
|
Post by qooqǝɯɐƃ on Aug 11, 2010 0:45:04 GMT -5
No, but it's completely pointless to say that you can't be a fan of The Beatles if you've never heard The Beatles' music and similar things that would lead in the direction of behaviorism if not challenged up front. At this point in time, cognitive science is divided into two main schools of thought, nicknamed east-coast (MIT) and west-coast (Stanford, UC Berkeley), though they're not exclusively limited to their respective coasts. The schools of thought are divided on their level of empiricism vs innateness, east-coast theorists believing more is innate, west-coast believing a greater deal is learned, though neither of them currently deny that genes are crucially important, setting both schools very far away from BF Skinner and behaviorism. The notion of the blank slate was a politically correct denial of reality. No denial of reality, even when it's good-intentioned (fear of eugenics), is good. What I am saying is that you can't create a society with no crime or violence because there are genetic incentives for power and competition and a scarily significant portion of the male population is sociopaths. OK, I do agree that it is not entirely the nurture that creates the human. But it sounds as if you are certain that humans are incapable of not being 'evil,' or committing criminal acts. I don't agree, but currently I don't think we know. I don't have a degree yet, but I do have knowledge of the subject matter that isn't prior to 1990, nor do I try to create a universal theory encompassing all religion and astrology, among other debunked nonsense, or spread the ridiculous and ever-debunked idea that the September 11th attacks were done by the US Government for the benefit of corporations. (I should remind you that this is a critique of the entirety of Zeitgeist: The Movie. I have no word as to whether or not the Venus project is directly associated with the rest of the film.) OK you're completely mixing up The Venus Project and Peter Joseph's Zeitgeist movie. I don't think Jacque Fresco agrees completely with much of what the first movie showed. (He even said himself he doesn't believe the conspiracy of 9/11.) And Zeitgeist 2 was a way of letting people know about TVP. I should have said communism, actually, but I could be wrong on that level. Maybe you could explain to me better what the means and ways of this project are. No, it doesn't fit into any of the political systems of today, it can only be likened to them. TVP would be closest to communism, however there would be no labour class, in fact no class stratification, no money, no dictator, it's sustainable, the people choose it... and so on. It may sound utopian and a fantasy but all it needs is the commitment of an intelligent community to create all of it. I feel like I need to remind you that this criticism is not of you, but of Fresco, even if it may not seem this way. His ideas have brainwashed a lot of innocent people, some people who I've known. (To clarify, brainwashing isn't something that happens with special techniques or chemicals people put in water supplies, or whatever Alex Jones shouts that it might be, but rather it's simply making the desired behaviors seem casual and natural. There is no "brainwashing," only suggestion, and it's something found more often in cult-leaders--which is what I believe is an appropriate term for Fresco is--than the government or big brother, etc.) I think you're mixing up Fresco with Peter Joseph again... If you are talking about Joseph I agree completely but Fresco isn't the same. He's tried to design a society that is completely sustainable that doesn't hold back any person or the advancement of technology. He's come to the conclusion that it's money that creates this barrier. While money does create incentive in our capitalist society, it also creates corruption, which has a much worse negative impact than the benefits of the incentive it creates. Also, people seem to think that the people living in this proposed society will lack incentive to create, learn, innovate, or work. I know for a fact it wouldn't stop me. It may stop a notable percent of the population, but when everything is available because of abundance there are NO barriers to hold back the people who want to create. IMO TVP is the most viable solution to the problems in our world today. If you have a better solution let me know -- let everyone know! this is associated with zeitgeist. i am disregarding it out of hand. I think that's just a little too close minded. The whole zeitgeist thing seems quite cult-ish, and I'm not on board. However, Jacque Fresco has been working on The Venus Project for like 35+ years. He's only gotten enough recognition by being in a popular movie made for counter-culturists. They're actually making a movie completely about TVP, I think they're calling it And the World Will Be One, which will hopefully make more than just the counter-culturists and crazies aware.
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Aug 11, 2010 3:09:36 GMT -5
fuck this SHIRT i'm tired. tomorrow i'll write a proper reason why the whole thing is bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by qooqǝɯɐƃ on Aug 11, 2010 3:41:03 GMT -5
fuck this SHIRT i'm tired. tomorrow i'll write a proper reason why the whole thing is bullshit. Looking forward to it. Although it's 3:40 PM here. Probably gunna be middle of the night for me when you reply.
|
|
|
Post by rialvestro on Aug 11, 2010 4:48:30 GMT -5
All the same flaws that currently exist in the world would still exist. The advancement in technology would be a nice and the new economy would be OK but over all it wouldn't change anything about the people living in it.
|
|