|
|
Post by alwaystextback on Mar 2, 2010 23:35:24 GMT -5
Warning! If you are not up to date on Lost, please click out now! We will be discussing the current episodes and theories of the final season of Lost!
|
|
|
|
Post by alwaystextback on Mar 2, 2010 23:36:42 GMT -5
So now that is out of the way...
Anyone care to share some of their theories?
I have a guess that Adam and Eve from the early episodes in season 1, and re-introduced in "The Lighthouse" last week are Rose and Bernard! They didn't time travel back from 1977.
Also I think Jack's baby mama who the producers say we've already met is not Juliet, but JULIET'S SISTER!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Mar 2, 2010 23:41:11 GMT -5
Oh, wow, a LOST thread. SWEET. I actually started a weekly YouTube show this season where I get right to the answers, questions and my theories. Feel free to watch them on my channel youtube.com/varygoode to get an idea of where I stand.
For now, I think alwaystextback is right about Rose & Bernard but not about David's mother. I think David's mother is simply Jack's ex-wife, Sarah.
I'll have my video discussing the latest episode, "Sundown," up tomorrow. I upload every Wednesday.
Just by the way... I'm a LOST freak and I pretty much have everything that's ever happened in my head at all times. If I don't recall something or just want some more theories, I usually hit up DarkUFO's site. They're great.
|
|
|
|
Post by alwaystextback on Mar 2, 2010 23:56:53 GMT -5
^ I don't think it's his ex wife, that's too easy, plus his age doesn't fit the timeline for it to be her.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Mar 2, 2010 23:59:00 GMT -5
You need to recall that the alternate timeline has MANY changes, so that little observation may not matter. I mean, Hurley is a lucky phenom now!
There's more going on than what we all thought, definitely.
|
|
|
|
Post by alwaystextback on Mar 3, 2010 0:50:42 GMT -5
Yeah but his ex wife is just too easy...they writers don't want us to just guess that simple.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Mar 3, 2010 0:56:18 GMT -5
I don't think it's safe to assume that just because it's simple, it can't be true. Most "twists" throughout the show have turned out to be totally logical, had we seen all of the clues in a different order or with more clarity.
Plus, I think most casual viewers wouldn't even remember about Jack's ex-wife's baby-daddy drama from awhile back.
|
|
|
|
Post by alwaystextback on Mar 3, 2010 1:00:07 GMT -5
Well true, but twists like Jack and Claire being related and stuff were things no one could see coming, and as the show is drawing to a close I think they're wanting to make our jaws drop more than ever.
Either way, the advancement of "war" in tonight's episode with the man in black and the others/survivors at the temple was AWESOME!
|
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Mar 3, 2010 11:37:32 GMT -5
snape kills dumbledore
|
|
grover
Moon
whatever.
Posts: 203
|
Post by grover on Mar 3, 2010 22:54:47 GMT -5
i SO did not see sayid killing dogen.
wow you guys seem to be hardcore fans, anyone here residents of the lost forum over at sucks?
|
|
|
|
Post by alwaystextback on Mar 3, 2010 23:45:33 GMT -5
^ nah, i'm just now getting into the whole online discussion thing haha
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Mar 4, 2010 9:13:28 GMT -5
grover: Nope. Besides this thread, my little YouTube show has been the only online discussion I've ever done on LOST.
|
|
|
|
Post by sammimullins on Mar 4, 2010 19:34:45 GMT -5
I never thought about what happened to Rose and Bernard. That is a really good idea. Anyone else think it was majorly creepy when Claire was singing and They were walking around the dead bodies. 0.0 i think it was the creepiest thing on LOST yet. Also. I think the order in which Jacob is contacting the "potentials" is in the order of the numbers. Does anyone remember what Degree They set it on to get Shepherds location? At the Lighthouse that is. That might have something to do with it.
|
|
grover
Moon
whatever.
Posts: 203
|
Post by grover on Mar 4, 2010 20:06:59 GMT -5
it was 23
jarrah's, locke's, shephard's, kwon's, reyes', ande ford's numbers were all 4,8,15,16,23, 42 for those who don't already know, clearly theres one of you so yeah.
locke,was 4
kwon was 42
dont remember what the other threes' were specfically.
other fun facts about that.
littlerton has a number (somewhere over a hundred) but is CROSSED OUT, interestigly enough.
austen has a number, and is not crossed out, but is 51, wonder why she doesnt get one of the special numbers.
walaace is 108 (the number jacob told them to turn to and is also the sum of the numbers) but is CROSSED OUT
straume may have a number too. there was one that looked like it might be him.
if anyone remembers, frank was said to be a candidate but I know nothing of a number for lapidus being spotted.
|
|
|
|
Post by leviroseman on Mar 5, 2010 21:18:22 GMT -5
that show is way too confusing
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Mar 7, 2010 23:04:55 GMT -5
The next episode is called "Dr. Linus." I'm a little worried that Ben's gonna bite the dust. Am I alone in that worry?
|
|
|
|
Post by magicoa on Mar 8, 2010 23:26:41 GMT -5
Yeah but his ex wife is just too easy and thats why david was born,ZING! |
|
|
|
Post by magicoa on Mar 8, 2010 23:28:04 GMT -5
i SO did not see sayid killing dogen. wow you guys seem to be hardcore fans, anyone here residents of the lost forum over at sucks? im a member of the lost forum site grover,i dont know what u mean by over at sucks,where is sucks |
|
|
|
Post by Catiebugged on Mar 9, 2010 2:39:17 GMT -5
Hopefully we will get more answers pretty soon....And I agree with the Adam and Eve theory.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Mar 10, 2010 23:14:24 GMT -5
So that last episode was pretty great. I had at least one cool realization from it. I discuss the goods in the new episode of "Vary Lost" which is my weekly LOST Discussion series. Here it is! |
|
