|
Post by Breepop on Sept 29, 2010 11:21:16 GMT -5
You know what your (bomb) argument could be equated to for me? Forum Games. Jesus H. Christ I hate that forum. It's so effing distracting and pointless and spammy.
Lets get rid of that. >:[
|
|
|
Post by Breepop on Sept 29, 2010 11:24:15 GMT -5
Oh, one last thing. teehee.
Could you stop with the "we" stuff? You're not speaking for everyone. You're speaking for yourself. Now, yeah, yeah, yeah, you may have spoken to a few of your friends and they agree with you because they have nothing better to agree with, but that doesn't mean you should be speaking for everyone. You always try to speak for everyone. I don't get why. It's ok for something to be your opinion alone. You don't have to have teammates to be able to express an opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Insane_Zang on Sept 29, 2010 11:29:50 GMT -5
You know what your (bomb) argument could be equated to for me? Forum Games. Jesus H. Christ I hate that forum. It's so effing distracting and pointless and spammy. Lets get rid of that. >:[ The only important threads there (in my opinion) are the two role playing games. Those could easily be moved to A&E
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Sept 29, 2010 13:14:16 GMT -5
bree, by we as i indicated in my earlier posts i was referring to those who voted yes.
|
|
|
Post by Breepop on Sept 29, 2010 13:23:31 GMT -5
Even still, you can't speak for them. As I said before, the poll is way too black and white for such a murky issue. Just because someone voted "Yes" doesn't mean they have the same opinion as you. That's like... geez, being pro-life and trying to speak for everyone who is pro-life with just your view of it. That's insane. There are so many different angles to "pro-life"... just because you and 25 other people voted "pro-life" on a poll doesn't mean you can speak for the other 25 people. Not to mention, some of those who vote yes could have change their mind by now (same for "no"s). Or some of those who voted yes could have been misinformed or naive about the situation (same for "no"s). Some of those who voted yes could have simply done so because they hold some secret, buring hatred for Dan Brown. You must realize how flawed a poll on such a debatable issue is. This discussion is getting waaaaaay off base. But whatever, at least we're keeping it more civil than usual. XD
|
|
|
Post by Joey on Sept 29, 2010 13:34:07 GMT -5
Even still, you can't speak for them. As I said before, the poll is way too black and white for such a murky issue. Just because someone voted "Yes" doesn't mean they have the same opinion as you. That's like... geez, being pro-life and trying to speak for everyone who is pro-life with just your view of it. That's insane. There are so many different angles to "pro-life"... just because you and 25 other people voted "pro-life" on a poll doesn't mean you can speak for the other 25 people. Not to mention, some of those who vote yes could have change their mind by now (same for "no"s). Or some of those who voted yes could have been misinformed or naive about the situation (same for "no"s). Some of those who voted yes could have simply done so because they hold some secret, buring hatred for Dan Brown. You must realize how flawed a poll on such a debatable issue is. This discussion is getting waaaaaay off base. But whatever, at least we're keeping it more civil than usual. XD sorry, of topic bu in light of a way some people I know are---YES! I LOVE THAT ANALOGY! GET THAT INTO PEOPLES HEADS, IM PRO-LIFE, NOT A FRICKING INSANE HELL CASTER! Ahem, anyway. Why does everything go back to my poll? Its proboards, not me In response in ways to keep the Dan 3.0 section cleaner, maybe have a Main Board like we do now for Promoting tasks already made. A subforum for task ideas(discussion on how to make better) A subforum for creating collations(What happened to those?) and a subforum for task carry outs(Threads made by dan/admins only, like the sticky threads they have already). There are probably some more, but that would be good.
|
|
|
Post by Sean on Sept 29, 2010 14:31:46 GMT -5
@bree : Dan 3.0 did cause a problem in the projects section (covering up real projects other than discussions) But now #projectphoenix has fixed it... I see no problem That was less Dan 3.0's fault, and more ProBoards/the admins' fault. Dan 3.0 itself did absolutely nothing to cover up other projects. Any active board being there would have caused the same problem. ProBoards and it's stupid freaking features covered up other projects. And apparently, none of the admins had this feature turned on and didn't recognize that that was happening. k so stop blaming Dan 3.0 for all your problems thx It could have been any section covering it... It just so happened to be the Dan 3.0 bit. But it is fixed so it is fine.
|
|