|
Post by UnfairBear on Apr 1, 2011 14:34:09 GMT -5
Ahhh ok I get you now. It was this "The Public branch will decide at first whether or not the government will get to vote on a bill." that confused me but I understand now that it's just that the public decides whether everyone will vote on something, rather than just whether or not the admins get to vote. Nvm.
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 1, 2011 15:13:41 GMT -5
Yeah, it doesn't give all the power to the administrative/moderation branch. That will lead to the demise of this forum.
|
|
|
Post by newschooled on Apr 1, 2011 16:31:44 GMT -5
K I'm down.
|
|
|
Post by UnfairBear on Apr 1, 2011 16:33:54 GMT -5
You sure are using varitations of that reference a lot, Ron
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 1, 2011 18:41:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by newschooled on Apr 1, 2011 20:00:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by UnfairBear on Apr 2, 2011 4:15:37 GMT -5
oh. aw =(
|
|
Xanast
Star
Just keep staring...
Posts: 598
|
Post by Xanast on Apr 2, 2011 14:53:18 GMT -5
Good document. I vote it into action. Badabing, badaboom.
|
|
Camoon
Star
[AWD:01020307]
Trust your pilot, respect your monkey.
Posts: 574
|
Post by Camoon on Apr 2, 2011 18:59:44 GMT -5
I think this should be implemented definitely, even if I do hate bureaucracy, but I just have to accept that bureaucracy is why our world is as organized as it is.
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 3, 2011 7:12:22 GMT -5
I still need admin approval, because this isn't the system, yet.
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Apr 3, 2011 11:18:54 GMT -5
meh imma say no to all this nonsense...we have enough fighting as it is normally
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 3, 2011 12:12:08 GMT -5
meh imma say no to all this nonsense...we have enough fighting as it is normally This minimizes fighting as it distributes power and gives an organized sequence of how things will be done.
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Apr 3, 2011 12:15:40 GMT -5
no...it maximizes fighting because it gives power to too many with the potential for even MORE people to get power...THAT causes fighting. we are not a country...we are a forum. transparency would be nice but this would just cause LOTS of fighting...yeah.
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 3, 2011 12:28:23 GMT -5
no...it maximizes fighting because it gives power to too many with the potential for even MORE people to get power...THAT causes fighting. we are not a country...we are a forum. transparency would be nice but this would just cause LOTS of fighting...yeah. I have edited it so that members can only vote on suggestions. I'm not exactly sure what you mean by what's in bold. Bannings and other matters that must remain secretive will be handled by the government only.
|
|
|
Post by Insane_Zang on Apr 3, 2011 12:31:26 GMT -5
Not secretive, but not up to the members
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 3, 2011 12:32:11 GMT -5
Gah, Ito be doing Science work! Shoo, shoo!
|
|
|
Post by UnfairBear on Apr 3, 2011 13:29:58 GMT -5
I was just about to say that we need this kind of system because suggestions so often get overlooked or forgotten. But then I realised that the good ones don't, and they get implemented... so now I'm dubious of this whole thing. O.o
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Apr 3, 2011 13:38:17 GMT -5
be dubious...be very very...dubious...
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Apr 3, 2011 13:58:56 GMT -5
Scooby Dubious?
|
|
|
Post by UnfairBear on Apr 3, 2011 14:04:03 GMT -5
|
|