Post by rialvestro on Apr 14, 2010 23:12:18 GMT -5
If you don't know the difference between the two, a phobia is a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it. Fears which are not phobias by this definition would all be rational.
To distinguish between rational and irrational for the purpose of this topic we are only going to refer to the rational as a "fear" and the irrational as a phobia. We will be talking about many different fears and phobias and weather or not they are properly classified or even if there is a proper classification.
Now for a great many years I didn't really believe that I had any phobias as all the phobias I supposidy had were rational to me. I thought until about 2 years ago that phobias did not really exsist. However after a spicific event that I'd rather not talk about and has nothing to do with this debate so don't ask, but after this event I found out that I had developed claustrophobia.
If you don't know, claustrophobia is an abnormal fear of being in enclosed or narrow places. So for the first time ever I have a fear with no rational thinking behind it and I can understand what a phobia is.
That being said just because something is classified as a phobia doesn't really mean that it is irrational. I also have arachnophobia, the pathological fear or loathing of spiders. However this is not actully irrational because some spiders, aside from hurting alot, when they bite can also make you sick or kill you as they are poisonous.
To this my argument is that in order for a fear of spiders to truely be a phobia you would have to be scared by spiders who aren't even real. Someone who really has arachnophobia would be afraid of a picture of a spider just as much as the real thing. Someone with a fear of spiders and not a phobia would only be scared by a real spider and be perfectly OK with looking at pictures. As such, I do not actully have arachnophobia as I have no problems with pictures of spiders.
So who is it that decides what fears are rational or not? How do spicific fears get classified as phobias when there very well could be rational reasons for the fear to exsist?
To distinguish between rational and irrational for the purpose of this topic we are only going to refer to the rational as a "fear" and the irrational as a phobia. We will be talking about many different fears and phobias and weather or not they are properly classified or even if there is a proper classification.
Now for a great many years I didn't really believe that I had any phobias as all the phobias I supposidy had were rational to me. I thought until about 2 years ago that phobias did not really exsist. However after a spicific event that I'd rather not talk about and has nothing to do with this debate so don't ask, but after this event I found out that I had developed claustrophobia.
If you don't know, claustrophobia is an abnormal fear of being in enclosed or narrow places. So for the first time ever I have a fear with no rational thinking behind it and I can understand what a phobia is.
That being said just because something is classified as a phobia doesn't really mean that it is irrational. I also have arachnophobia, the pathological fear or loathing of spiders. However this is not actully irrational because some spiders, aside from hurting alot, when they bite can also make you sick or kill you as they are poisonous.
To this my argument is that in order for a fear of spiders to truely be a phobia you would have to be scared by spiders who aren't even real. Someone who really has arachnophobia would be afraid of a picture of a spider just as much as the real thing. Someone with a fear of spiders and not a phobia would only be scared by a real spider and be perfectly OK with looking at pictures. As such, I do not actully have arachnophobia as I have no problems with pictures of spiders.
So who is it that decides what fears are rational or not? How do spicific fears get classified as phobias when there very well could be rational reasons for the fear to exsist?