Tido
Planet
Long live lazyness
Posts: 486
|
Post by Tido on Jun 5, 2010 2:10:51 GMT -5
foo fighters
|
|
|
Post by click3tyclick on Jun 5, 2010 2:36:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by metallica210 on Jun 5, 2010 12:46:03 GMT -5
tha foo
|
|
earth
Moon
the awesome
Posts: 245
|
Post by earth on Jun 5, 2010 12:57:07 GMT -5
never heard of foofighters
|
|
|
Post by click3tyclick on Jun 5, 2010 12:58:35 GMT -5
never heard of foofighters
|
|
Tido
Planet
Long live lazyness
Posts: 486
|
Post by Tido on Jun 5, 2010 14:34:16 GMT -5
never heard of foofighters when Kurt Cobain died, beginning The Drummer DaveGrohl FooFighters In F.F is Singer and guitarist
|
|
|
Post by thequirkyduo on Jun 9, 2010 22:25:36 GMT -5
Nirvana PWNs the FooFighters, kinda'
|
|
|
Post by newschooled on Jun 10, 2010 14:52:12 GMT -5
If you don't own a Nirvana OR Foo Fighters album, chances are you may have to wait an entire .0000000048 milliseconds to hear them on the radio.
I choose neither, overplayed was an understatement years ago.
|
|
|
Post by icarus on Jun 13, 2010 2:00:23 GMT -5
Nirvana was... blah. Foo Fighters is slightly better than blah. So...
Both were pretty good but I think Foo Fighters is making better music overall.
I just hate how overplayed they tend to be.
|
|
|
Post by click3tyclick on Jun 13, 2010 16:34:48 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2010 18:33:33 GMT -5
you can't really compare Nirvana with Foo Fighters.. Yeah, Dave Grohl played in both, but their style is totally different..
Personally I'm more of a fan of FF, but Nirvana is also amazing from time to time. I think we just have to conclude that Dave Grohl is epic. (QOTSA much?)
|
|
|
Post by swan on Jun 15, 2010 1:03:10 GMT -5
I saw the Foo Fighters live a few years ago and I was totally blown away. I thought they'd be good but they were amazing. Dave Grohl's a hell of a front man.
That said I still prefer Nirvana.
|
|