|
Post by rialvestro on Jun 27, 2010 22:36:57 GMT -5
I have back problems , a lote of people in this Generation have because we get bigger and the next Generation will get bigger . i believe in 50-75 years human can`t use the back . Growing taller does not cause back problems. What in the world gave you that idea? Back problems can be caused by a number of other things, family history, other health issues, posture, lifting heavy things the wrong way. But to be honest I think the number one cause of back problems are the hard plastic chairs that kids sit in for long periods of time at school. If the chair isn't comfortable it's going to cause the person sitting in it to fidget and sit more awkwardly and even if you can get them to stand still the hard material is still going to cause back pain later in life. So someone needs to design more comfortable chairs that will encourage people to sit properly thus reducing the risk for back pain.
|
|
|
Post by lolsall on Jun 28, 2010 23:09:46 GMT -5
i really dont think we will beacause of the simplicity of our governments want to do nothing but war and sooner or l8r the thing weve done since we began will also be the last thing we do
|
|
The Doctor
Moon
I wear my sunglasses at night
Posts: 147
|
Post by The Doctor on Jun 29, 2010 20:02:30 GMT -5
Just got back from the year Apple'six and There are still humans there, so I´d say yes
|
|
|
Post by krzych32 on Jun 30, 2010 0:45:03 GMT -5
I have back problems , a lote of people in this Generation have because we get bigger and the next Generation will get bigger . i believe in 50-75 years human can`t use the back. quote] Are you joking? Plz tell me you are joking.....
|
|
|
Post by IMAGINARYphilosophy on Jun 30, 2010 0:59:08 GMT -5
Depends on if we make it through the zombie apocalypse and the subsequent robot holocaust.
|
|
|
Post by Borbus on Jun 30, 2010 7:59:30 GMT -5
Next 100 years: probably. Next 1000 years: I doubt it.
|
|
|
Post by Benyamin on Jul 1, 2010 19:34:34 GMT -5
Next 100 years: probably. Next 1000 years: I doubt it. Why? if we find enough solutions to last 150 - 200 years we'll probably last a much longer time
|
|
|
Post by Jake on Jul 2, 2010 3:57:25 GMT -5
i really dont think we will beacause of the simplicity of our governments want to do nothing but war and sooner or l8r the thing weve done since we began will also be the last thing we do I'm fairly sure no one wants war, unless they believe it's for the greater good. There's a number of corrupt leaders, but all of them know that if they do something such as launch a nuclear missile, one will be fired back at them straight away. It's just suicidal.
|
|
|
Post by krzych32 on Jul 2, 2010 11:34:48 GMT -5
Next 100 years: probably. Next 1000 years: I doubt it. Why? if we find enough solutions to last 150 - 200 years we'll probably last a much longer time What's so special about the next 150-200 years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2010 12:46:36 GMT -5
i really dont think we will beacause of the simplicity of our governments want to do nothing but war and sooner or l8r the thing weve done since we began will also be the last thing we do I'm fairly sure no one wants war, unless they believe it's for the greater good. There's a number of corrupt leaders, but all of them know that if they do something such as launch a nuclear missile, one will be fired back at them straight away. It's just suicidal. No one wants to pass trough a war. But those corrupt leaders surely want to win wars (even if they don't want to pass trough them).
|
|
bullskitur
Planet
Intelligence requires not confusing what you believe with what you know
Posts: 306
|
Post by bullskitur on Jul 2, 2010 16:10:25 GMT -5
i really dont think we will beacause of the simplicity of our governments want to do nothing but war and sooner or l8r the thing weve done since we began will also be the last thing we do I'm fairly sure no one wants war, unless they believe it's for the greater good. There's a number of corrupt leaders, but all of them know that if they do something such as launch a nuclear missile, one will be fired back at them straight away. It's just suicidal. What if a country with nuclear weapons is theological and believes that it's doing gods work and will be rewarded in the afterlife? All it takes is one. But I don't believe nuclear war or the following nuclear winter will wipe out the human race. It might kill several billions and set civilization back couple of centuries but I think at least hundred million will survive.
|
|
|
Post by amazingproductions on Jul 4, 2010 16:31:33 GMT -5
I don't know, humans have a habit of loving to blow each other up... but i think we will SURVIVE. Succeed? Probably not
|
|
|
Post by FreezePop on Jul 4, 2010 18:38:23 GMT -5
People who think global warming is as bad as it sounds, should grab a pan,put it over their head and sit under their table. Its a hoax people, or at least a small one!
Global warming has never been fully proven. In prehistoric times, temperature was almost 5 degrees higher and the earth never had trouble during those times. Also, emails have been dug up which were exchanged by high ranking sceintists who told each other that numbers should be exaggerated so it would garner more attention.
|
|
Obilink
Meteor
Pink is a Plus
Posts: 68
|
Post by Obilink on Jul 4, 2010 18:54:14 GMT -5
With our exponential improvement of technology, I see the possibility of humans evolving into a better form/state. However, I see nothing that would cause our race to end. Even if there was a "Nuclear World War" or something similar, much of the race would live. They would simply be reverted back to a more primitive (and possibly more peaceful) state. Global warming has never been fully proven.. It has been proven, as has global cooling. However, it has not been proven as a possibly apocalyptical occurrence. It is simply a natural part of life, and does not affect the Earth itself positively or negatively. It gets hotter, then it gets colder, and then it gets hotter again. It happens, and we adapt to deal with it. It's "no big".
|
|
|
Post by FreezePop on Jul 4, 2010 19:04:43 GMT -5
Global warming has never been fully proven.. However, it has not been proven as a possibly apocalyptical occurrence. That is what I meant, yet, the global media dares to say it is apocalytipical. Im not one of those conspiracy theory type of people, but I think global media has been putting to much attention on the death part of life and not the fun part. Focusing on the death part makes people who follow the herd paranoid and scared.
|
|
Obilink
Meteor
Pink is a Plus
Posts: 68
|
Post by Obilink on Jul 4, 2010 19:08:01 GMT -5
However, it has not been proven as a possibly apocalyptical occurrence. Im not one of those conspiracy theory type of people, but I think global media has been putting to much attention on the death part of life and not the fun part. Focusing on the death part makes people who follow the herd paranoid and scared. I would agree. The Main-Stream Media is completely one-sided, biased, and party oriented. We need to revert back to the state of pure journalism, where the job was simply delivering news to those who wanted/needed to know. No bias and no bull included.
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Jul 5, 2010 23:24:19 GMT -5
No wai. Teh worlds guna end in 2012. were all guna dye. No* way*. The* world* is* going* to* end in 2012. We* are* all going* to* die*.
|
|