|
|
Post by drjafjaf on Mar 3, 2010 22:27:22 GMT -5
I want to play a little game with all of you. All I want you to do, is prove the existence of Pluto. Yes, you heard me, prove that Pluto is real, not a myth. You'd be surprised at how difficult this is.  |
|
|
|
Post by mrpickles on Mar 4, 2010 0:56:31 GMT -5
 Did I win?  |
|
ElfLady
Planet
I'm a crazy!
Posts: 409
|
Post by ElfLady on Mar 4, 2010 1:31:18 GMT -5
Epic, epic. ^_^
|
|
|
|
Post by zAkAtAk on Mar 4, 2010 2:19:37 GMT -5
looks like thread is over.
good job mrpickles.
post 114
|
|
|
|
Post by nickgreyden on Mar 4, 2010 2:22:06 GMT -5
lol this thread is full of win from just the first two posts :-)
|
|
|
|
Post by awsomeness122 on Mar 4, 2010 2:31:22 GMT -5
best thread ever of all time
|
|
ElfLady
Planet
I'm a crazy!
Posts: 409
|
Post by ElfLady on Mar 4, 2010 2:35:08 GMT -5
Agreed.
It's winsomeness cannot be put into words of any language yet invented by man.
|
|
Frejman
Meteor
It's just me
Posts: 81
|
Post by Frejman on Mar 4, 2010 3:31:07 GMT -5
*invents the language*
Akalaklaklaklaklaklaaamookableebity!
Manabolaslabslab.
Hekkessihf!
Kekka menif!
<2
Moopleppa.
Ayumyum!
And that concludes my praise for this thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by Insane_Zang on Mar 4, 2010 3:49:08 GMT -5
Is SPOTM v2.0 just gonna be udder randomness now?
|
|
ElfLady
Planet
I'm a crazy!
Posts: 409
|
Post by ElfLady on Mar 4, 2010 3:49:46 GMT -5
David, I love you. ^_^ <3 *surprise glomps*
<2 = win
|
|
Linus
Star
Life is complex; it has both real and imaginary components
Posts: 614
|
Post by Linus on Mar 4, 2010 4:26:56 GMT -5
Did I win? Yes, you did x) |
|
|
|
Post by zAkAtAk on Mar 4, 2010 9:15:02 GMT -5
Is SPOTM v2.0 just gonna be udder randomness now? Well then it's good not to change then. |
|
|
|
Post by drjafjaf on Mar 4, 2010 16:46:17 GMT -5
Clearly a photo made by a computer . You've yet to actually prove the existence of Pluto, either the Dog or the Planet, I don't care which one. |
|
|
|
Post by Steven on Mar 5, 2010 0:49:29 GMT -5
Clearly a photo made by a computer . You've yet to actually prove the existence of Pluto, either the Dog or the Planet, I don't care which one. You aren't one of those Flat Earthers that believe NASA is part of a huge conspiracy and therefor we can't trust images from them, are you? On the note of NASA, you could indefinitely argue that any images we provide of little Pluto, even from NASA, are computer generated (as the Hubble Telescope does not photograph in color, the final image is a composite rendered by a computer). EDIT: Also, "either the Dog or the Planet" - Pluto is not a planet anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by drjafjaf on Mar 5, 2010 20:41:43 GMT -5
On the note of NASA, you could indefinitely argue that any images we provide of little Pluto, even from NASA, are computer generated (as the Hubble Telescope does not photograph in color, the final image is a composite rendered by a computer). Exactly, you can't prove ANYTHING in this world, there's always some explanation for it's absents. |
|
|
|
Post by Ryan on Mar 5, 2010 21:05:11 GMT -5
Exactly, you can't prove ANYTHING in this world, there's always some explanation for it's absents. Well, thanks to Descartes we can prove that the self exists...but as far as proving planets or dogs...nope that's impossible |
|
