|
|
Post by Spot Moon Cool on Sept 14, 2010 9:49:11 GMT -5
Well if Mircosoft made a new Windows they would at call it Windows 7.1 so why can't Dan do the same  |
|
|
|
Post by amon91 on Sept 14, 2010 16:55:18 GMT -5
Nah... He's just rebooting it, no need to rename the show. IMO
|
|
|
|
Post by SwimFellow on Sept 14, 2010 20:51:13 GMT -5
I like it (v)
|
|
Nakor
Star
Non-Prophet
Posts: 991
|
Post by Nakor on Sept 14, 2010 20:53:04 GMT -5
That'd be an upgrade, not a reboot.  If he upgrades it, then we'll consider that. |
|
olatnip
Moon
Jonathan Rodriguez on skype :D
Posts: 118
|
Post by olatnip on Sept 14, 2010 23:27:27 GMT -5
what happened with Dan 3.0?
|
|
ksparks777
Meteorite
Im kinda surprised this still exists
Posts: 35
|
Post by ksparks777 on Sept 17, 2010 13:00:37 GMT -5
But that would destroy the Star Wars reference that is so cool, D3PO ftw
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Power-Explosion on Sept 19, 2010 18:22:08 GMT -5
But that would destroy the Star Wars reference that is so cool, D3PO ftw I agree  |
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Power-Explosion on Sept 19, 2010 18:22:29 GMT -5
oh, and windows is evil, so ya |
|
|
|
Post by Spot Moon Cool on Sept 19, 2010 20:45:34 GMT -5
But that would destroy the Star Wars reference that is so cool, D3PO ftw Then why can it not be called the C/D3P0? |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Brown on Sept 20, 2010 12:49:41 GMT -5
I think we should technically call it Dan 3.0.1, while still usually referring to the project as Dan 3.0. If we ever make a huuuge change we can adopt the "Dan 3.1" title, but this isn't huge enough to merit that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spot Moon Cool on Sept 20, 2010 14:46:45 GMT -5
I think we should technically call it Dan 3.0.1, while still usually referring to the project as Dan 3.0. If we ever make a huuuge change we can adopt the "Dan 3.1" title, but this isn't huge enough to merit that. Did Dan Brown reply to my thread. So it gonna be called Dan 3.0.1. |
|
