Cortney
Star
[AWD:0c15]The Objectioner
The Bown
Posts: 885
|
Post by Cortney on Jul 29, 2010 10:05:45 GMT -5
Ooooh. Well you shoulda said that in the first place! ;P
|
|
thelighterdark
Planet
"Get busy living, or get busy dying." - Andy Dufresne [Tim Robbins], The Shawshawnk Redemption, 1994
Posts: 374
|
Post by thelighterdark on Jul 30, 2010 5:07:54 GMT -5
It should be 250.
The largest images in signatures are typically signature pictures, whose dimensions are 350-400x125-150, which at worst would still leave a member with 50 pixels of space left, which is plenty for text.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2010 7:36:07 GMT -5
What about your signature? It has a height of almost 300 pixels.
|
|
thelighterdark
Planet
"Get busy living, or get busy dying." - Andy Dufresne [Tim Robbins], The Shawshawnk Redemption, 1994
Posts: 374
|
Post by thelighterdark on Jul 30, 2010 14:57:54 GMT -5
I'm perfectly aware of that. If the time comes where I need to get a new one, a new one will be made.
250 is literally the perfect height. You can fit everything you need within that range.
|
|
|
Post by NormanTheOne on Jul 30, 2010 15:07:04 GMT -5
Not my penis.
|
|
|
Post by Sean on Jul 30, 2010 17:26:27 GMT -5
It should most defiantly be 200.
Whenever I make a new serious sig it is 300X175px and that looks fine.
|
|
thelighterdark
Planet
"Get busy living, or get busy dying." - Andy Dufresne [Tim Robbins], The Shawshawnk Redemption, 1994
Posts: 374
|
Post by thelighterdark on Jul 30, 2010 17:42:32 GMT -5
It should most defiantly be 200. Whenever I make a new serious sig it is 300X175px and that looks fine. Plus room for some lines of text or any smaller pictures = 250.
|
|
|
Post by Sean on Jul 30, 2010 17:55:49 GMT -5
Right: To help decide the height: 0 PX: 50PX: 100PX: 150PX: 200PX: 250PX: 300PX: 350PX: 400PX:
|
|
kovac
Moon
I am the Alpha and the Omega.
Posts: 161
|
Post by kovac on Jul 30, 2010 18:00:18 GMT -5
200PX says I!
|
|
|
Post by Breepop on Jul 30, 2010 18:04:44 GMT -5
I like 300.
Really, I don't even find 400 that annoying.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm not going for OMG SIGNATURE NAZIS, I'm going for JUST DON'T ANNOY ME, K?
So yeah.
|
|
|
Post by Insane_Zang on Jul 30, 2010 18:06:29 GMT -5
We're just making rules for no reason. No one even has a signature over 300. (besides Sean of course). If someone does, please correct me
|
|
kovac
Moon
I am the Alpha and the Omega.
Posts: 161
|
Post by kovac on Jul 30, 2010 18:22:32 GMT -5
We're just making rules for no reason. No one even has a signature over 300. (besides Sean of course). If someone does, please correct me ThisIsNotTido EDIT: but i love his sigs...
|
|
|
Post by NormanTheOne on Jul 30, 2010 20:42:04 GMT -5
That pig sig keeps the whole SPOTM going for Thor's sake!
|
|
|
Post by Sean on Jul 31, 2010 4:25:36 GMT -5
I still think there should be a limit.
200px or 250px looks about right
|
|
thelighterdark
Planet
"Get busy living, or get busy dying." - Andy Dufresne [Tim Robbins], The Shawshawnk Redemption, 1994
Posts: 374
|
Post by thelighterdark on Jul 31, 2010 12:08:20 GMT -5
We're just making rules for no reason. No one even has a signature over 300. (besides Sean of course). If someone does, please correct me There is a definite reason for making rules. If there's only one person who steals from grocery stores in the whole world, should we not make it a crime? Huge signatures take away from a post and make the forum look over-embellished at the same time. Sure you can put colors and stuff and pretty pictures, but when 80% of the browsing area is signatures and 20% is post, it's kind of stupid looking. P.S. My signature is almost 300px.
|
|
|
Post by Insane_Zang on Jul 31, 2010 18:46:01 GMT -5
We're just making rules for no reason. No one even has a signature over 300. (besides Sean of course). If someone does, please correct me There is a definite reason for making rules. If there's only one person who steals from grocery stores in the whole world, should we not make it a crime? Huge signatures take away from a post and make the forum look over-embellished at the same time. Sure you can put colors and stuff and pretty pictures, but when 80% of the browsing area is signatures and 20% is post, it's kind of stupid looking. P.S. My signature is almost 300px. I meant, it's a law like the one in Arizona that donkeys can't sleep in bathtubs. It's not like people are actually breaking that rule
|
|
|
Post by Breepop on Jul 31, 2010 18:53:44 GMT -5
It won't really be a rule. It will just be a guideline.
No one is going to get in trouble for having a big signature... that'd be ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by NormanTheOne on Jul 31, 2010 20:04:08 GMT -5
Then what's the point of the rule/guideline? I say we avoid RIDICULOUS sigs, so like a 600 limit is good.
|
|
|
Post by Insane_Zang on Aug 1, 2010 1:17:44 GMT -5
It won't really be a rule. It will just be a guideline. No one is going to get in trouble for having a big signature... that'd be ridiculous. Oh, so it's just frowned upon, like masturbating on a plane
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2010 6:09:29 GMT -5
I say we avoid RIDICULOUS sigs, so like a 600 limit is good. I agree with this.
|
|