Cortney
Star
[AWD:0c15]The Objectioner
The Bown
Posts: 885
|
Post by Cortney on Jul 27, 2010 18:44:25 GMT -5
Do you guys think there should be a set pixel height limit for signatures? If so, what would be an ideal height?
|
|
|
Post by Insane_Zang on Jul 27, 2010 20:03:41 GMT -5
No
|
|
|
Post by Johncoyne on Jul 27, 2010 20:07:02 GMT -5
Yes. I don't know what it should be, though.
|
|
|
Post by Benyamin on Jul 27, 2010 21:33:54 GMT -5
Yes. I don't know what it should be, though.
|
|
|
Post by bombmaniac on Jul 27, 2010 21:57:54 GMT -5
i think a reasonable height would be 180
|
|
|
Post by Ferrrrrre on Jul 28, 2010 4:40:58 GMT -5
Yesh, on another forums I used to be, they had: 200px height I guess that's pretty reasonabe
|
|
|
Post by Raydawn on Jul 28, 2010 4:56:05 GMT -5
|
|
Cortney
Star
[AWD:0c15]The Objectioner
The Bown
Posts: 885
|
Post by Cortney on Jul 28, 2010 10:10:38 GMT -5
Okie dokie, I added a poll.
|
|
|
Post by Ricky on Jul 28, 2010 10:16:59 GMT -5
I don't think there are many sigs that are too big in this forum. Still might be a good idea to set a limit just in case.
|
|
|
Post by Joey on Jul 28, 2010 12:15:44 GMT -5
I don't think there are many sigs that are too big in this forum. Still might be a good idea to set a limit just in case. coughseancough
|
|
|
Post by Insane_Zang on Jul 28, 2010 12:21:04 GMT -5
But Sean's is funny. So you have to scroll for another 2 seconds. Is it that bad? I can understand a length limit but height?
|
|
|
Post by fredrik on Jul 28, 2010 12:38:28 GMT -5
No, I do not think we need it, at least not any of the above options
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2010 13:28:58 GMT -5
The options given are all too small for my liking.
|
|
|
Post by Breepop on Jul 28, 2010 14:48:30 GMT -5
What James said. I think there needs to be a suggested limit, but that limit needs to be at the boarderline-- where a signature does start to get so big that it's annoying. 250 is too small... maybe 350? I have no idea what that looks like, just throwing a number out there. XD
By the way, guys... No one will be getting in trouble or punished for having too big of a signature. It will just be a suggestion. That way, we (we meaning members and admins) could PM someone and politely ask them to change their signature and refer to the Forum Guidelines.
ya.
|
|
Cortney
Star
[AWD:0c15]The Objectioner
The Bown
Posts: 885
|
Post by Cortney on Jul 28, 2010 15:11:39 GMT -5
Looks like we're getting a lot of no's anyway. Would you guys rather we (or you, if you'd like) just PM members with insanely large sigs?
|
|
|
Post by Sean on Jul 28, 2010 16:13:35 GMT -5
But Sean's is funny. So you have to scroll for another 2 seconds. Is it that bad? I can understand a length limit but height? - Is is actually because of this thread I made it, I think a limit should be put in. Im just having fun
|
|
Cortney
Star
[AWD:0c15]The Objectioner
The Bown
Posts: 885
|
Post by Cortney on Jul 28, 2010 16:22:16 GMT -5
- Is is actually because of this thread I made it, I think a limit should be put in. Im just having fun Even though this thread was made after you made it...? XD But Sean's is funny. So you have to scroll for another 2 seconds. Is it that bad? I can understand a length limit but height? lolwut? You mean characters? If that's the case, then we're complete opposites. XD
|
|
|
Post by Sean on Jul 28, 2010 16:26:39 GMT -5
It gets across the point that there should be a limit. by being huge...
|
|
Cortney
Star
[AWD:0c15]The Objectioner
The Bown
Posts: 885
|
Post by Cortney on Jul 28, 2010 16:44:44 GMT -5
Ah, I get what you're saying dawg.
|
|
|
Post by Insane_Zang on Jul 29, 2010 8:40:54 GMT -5
Width. I meant width >.>
|
|